[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYYSIndbqLdFkaM-@google.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 08:09:06 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>, Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 37/45] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Alloc external_spt page
for mirror page table splitting
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026, Yan Zhao wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 05:15:09PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> >
> > Enhance tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split() to allocate a page table page for the
> > external page table for splitting the mirror page table.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
> > [sean: use kvm_x86_ops.alloc_external_sp()]
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > index 3b0da898824a..4f5b80f0ca03 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> > @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_wrprot_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> > return spte_set;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(void)
> > +static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct tdp_iter *iter)
> > {
> > struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> >
> > @@ -1461,6 +1461,15 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(void)
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > + if (is_mirror_sptep(iter->sptep)) {
> tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split() is invoked in tdp_mmu_split_huge_pages_root() after
> rcu_read_unlock() is called.
>
> So, it's incorrect to invoke is_mirror_sptep() which internally contains
> rcu_dereference(), resulting in "WARNING: suspicious RCU usage".
Ah, now I see why the previous code pass in a bool. I don't love passing a bool,
but passing @iter is outright dangerous, so I guess this?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index a32192c35099..4d92c0d19d7c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_wrprot_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
}
static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct tdp_iter *iter)
+ bool is_mirror_sp)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
@@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm,
if (!sp->spt)
goto err_spt;
- if (is_mirror_sptep(iter->sptep)) {
+ if (is_mirror_sp) {
sp->external_spt = (void *)kvm_x86_call(alloc_external_sp)(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!sp->external_spt)
goto err_external_spt;
@@ -1525,6 +1525,7 @@ static int tdp_mmu_split_huge_pages_root(struct kvm *kvm,
gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
int target_level, bool shared)
{
+ const bool is_mirror_root = is_mirror_sp(root);
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = NULL;
struct tdp_iter iter;
@@ -1557,7 +1558,7 @@ static int tdp_mmu_split_huge_pages_root(struct kvm *kvm,
else
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- sp = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(kvm, &iter);
+ sp = tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(kvm, is_mirror_root);
if (shared)
read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists