[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260206161628.78161-1-boudewijn@delta-utec.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 17:16:28 +0100
From: Boudewijn van der Heide <boudewijn@...ta-utec.com>
To: ziy@...dia.com
Cc: Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
boudewijn@...ta-utec.com,
david@...hat.com,
duenwen@...gle.com,
hannes@...xchg.org,
harry.yoo@...cle.com,
jackmanb@...gle.com,
jane.chu@...cle.com,
jiaqiyan@...gle.com,
jthoughton@...gle.com,
linmiaohe@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
mhocko@...e.com,
muchun.song@...ux.dev,
nao.horiguchi@...il.com,
osalvador@...e.de,
rientjes@...gle.com,
rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com,
vbabka@...e.cz,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
william.roche@...cle.com,
willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Only free healthy pages in high-order has_hwpoisoned folio
Hi Yan, Zi,
> No, split code[1] sets has_hwpoison flag when it split a folio to a non-0 order
> folios. If you do not see it in your kernel code, you might need to update
> your kernel to latest stable one or one newer than or equal to 6.18.
Thanks for pointing out the split code. I went through the callstacks
again and I agree it propagates the flag correctly.
I missed this initially.
Kind regards,
Boudewijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists