[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e19dbe7e-353d-4c6b-9b62-582eec018d24@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 17:34:32 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Nihal Kumar Gupta <quic_nihalkum@...cinc.com>,
bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com, rfoss@...nel.org,
andi.shyti@...nel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org
Cc: quic_svankada@...cinc.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document qcs8300
compatible
On 21/01/2026 19:31, Nihal Kumar Gupta wrote:
> The three instances of CCI found on the QCS8300 are functionally the same
> as on a number of existing Qualcomm SoCs.
>
> Introduce a new SoC-specific compatible string "qcom,qcs8300-cci" with a
> common fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nihal Kumar Gupta <quic_nihalkum@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>
Incorrect SoB chain.
Having this broken at v9 is surprising.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists