[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYYXif7IPXnXZPnn@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 11:32:09 -0500
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cui Chao <cuichao1753@...tium.com.cn>, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Wang Yinfeng <wangyinfeng@...tium.com.cn>,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: numa_memblks: Identify the accurate NUMA ID
of CFMW
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 04:26:44PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> > This should fall out cleanly.
> >
> > The additional nodes won't be associated with anything, but could be
> > used for hotplug - I imagine.
> >
>
> That aligns with what I was thinking as a first solution to allowing this
> to be more dynamic. We can get clever later if this doesn't prove sufficient.
>
I can get this out pretty quickly, hopefully sometime next week.
I had a long talk with Dan about this topic previously, and I'm not sure
how we get more dynamic than this to be honest. nr_possible_nodes is
*definitely* expected to be immutable after __init all over the kernel,
it's used to allocate a memory.
Surface area is very large here.
~Gregory
Powered by blists - more mailing lists