linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document sm6150 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <73ce4035-412a-4b62-9c19-abb26d5237f5@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 17:31:51 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
 Wenmeng Liu <wenmeng.liu@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
 Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
 Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
 Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
 Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document sm6150
 compatible

On 04/02/2026 17:01, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Wenmeng,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 06:48:53PM +0800, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
>> Add the sm6150 CCI device string compatible.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenmeng Liu <wenmeng.liu@....qualcomm.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>

There is no dependency here. It should have never been placed here
(repeated to Qualcomm many times...). It seems like contributors want to
make their life more difficult and avoid merging their work...

Andi, please take the patch instead.

Best regards,
Krzysztof