[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7f04a29-0693-4df9-b0dd-c7c047c1f9fe@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 15:58:35 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, <corbet@....net>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
<Dave.Martin@....com>, <james.morse@....com>, <tglx@...nel.org>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <bsegall@...gle.com>,
<mgorman@...e.de>, <vschneid@...hat.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, <pmladek@...e.com>,
<feng.tang@...ux.alibaba.com>, <kees@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<fvdl@...gle.com>, <lirongqing@...du.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<seanjc@...gle.com>, <xin@...or.com>, <manali.shukla@....com>,
<dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>, <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
<mario.limonciello@....com>, <naveen@...nel.org>,
<elena.reshetova@...el.com>, <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <peternewman@...gle.com>, <eranian@...gle.com>,
<gautham.shenoy@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/19] fs/resctrl: Add new interface max_bandwidth
Hi Babu,
On 1/21/26 1:12 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> While min_bandwidth is exposed for each resource under
> /sys/fs/resctrl, the maximum supported bandwidth is not currently shown.
>
> Add max_bandwidth to report the maximum bandwidth permitted for a resource.
> This helps users understand the limits of the associated resource control
> group.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> ---
With resctrl fs being used by several architectures we should take care that
interface changes take all planned usages into account.
As shared at LPC [1] and email [2] we are already trying to create an interface
that works for everybody and it already contains a way to expose the maximum
bandwidth to user space. You attended that LPC session and [2] directed to you
received no response. This submission with a different interface is unexpected.
Reinette
[1] https://lpc.events/event/19/contributions/2093/attachments/1958/4172/resctrl%20Microconference%20LPC%202025%20Tokyo.pdf
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/fb1e2686-237b-4536-acd6-15159abafcba@intel.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists