[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0bcd3cb0-9231-4cb0-a726-c439d01f63e5@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 08:08:07 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Roger Shimizu <rosh@...ian.org>
Cc: Hongyang Zhao <hongyang.zhao@...ndersoft.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: lt9611: Support single Port
B input
On 05/02/2026 21:31, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 5:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:15:45PM +0800, Hongyang Zhao wrote:
>>> The LT9611 has two DSI input ports (Port A and Port B). Update the
>>> binding to clearly document the port mapping and allow using Port B
>>> alone when DSI is physically connected to Port B only.
>>>
>>> Changes:
>>> - Clarify port@0 corresponds to DSI Port A input
>>> - Clarify port@1 corresponds to DSI Port B input
>>> - Change port requirement from mandatory port@0 to anyOf port@...ort@1,
>>> allowing either port to be used independently
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hongyang Zhao <hongyang.zhao@...ndersoft.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Roger Shimizu <rosh@...ian.org>
>>
>> Where did this review happen? V1 had this tag, but the patch was
>> completely different, which means you were supposed to drop the tag.
>> Please perform review in public.
>
> FYI. v2 was updated per review feedback, which is public:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/7d9041a3-9d2b-469a-9fa7-89d53bbd2a1f@linaro.org/
Link above is not from Roger, so again - where did the review leading to
above tag happen?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists