[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260206-funny-beaver-of-trust-873343@quoll>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 09:01:43 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, srini@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, alexey.klimov@...aro.org, mohammad.rafi.shaik@....qualcomm.com,
quic_wcheng@...cinc.com, johan@...nel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com,
konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ASoC: qcom: q6apm: fix array out of bounds on
lpass ports
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 12:14:02PM -0500, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> lpass ports numbers have been added but the apm driver never got updated
> with new max port value that it uses to store dai specific data.
>
> This will result in array out of bounds and weird driver behaviour.
> Fix this by adding a new LPASS_MAX_PORT which is can be used by driver
> instead of using number and any new port additional can only be done in
> one place, which should avoid these type of mistakes in future.
>
> Also update the driver to use this LPASS_MAX_PORT.
>
> Fixes: 55b5fb369c02 ("ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports: Add USB_RX port")
> Cc: Stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h | 1 +
Why do you send this patch multiple times? I already replied to it.
NAK
And also impossible to reply via korg:
sendmail: server message: 550 5.1.1 <cnor+dt@...nel.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists