[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c225864f-192c-4cf0-a5fb-411de8c22eec@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 09:36:20 +0100
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@...nel.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable-6.6.y] mm: khugepaged refuses to freeze
On 2/6/26 06:12, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2/6/26 12:31 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>> On (26/02/06 12:38), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>> [..]
>>>
>>> Right, I thought about it but wasn't sure. Could the inner loop (e.g.
>>> collapse_file() in this particular case) loop long enough to fail
>>> suspend
>>> w/o ever giving the outer loop (khugepaged_do_scan()) a chance to
>>> freeze?
>
> Yes, that’s possible. However, if we add a try_to_freeze() check in the
> inner loop, we need to consider various scenarios (such as anonymous
> folio swap-in and other potential cases?), which feels too hacky to me.
>
>> For inner loops I wondered if cond_resched() could be an indicator of
>> where try_to_freeze() should be placed. Those cond_resched() calls
>> are there for a reason, after all. E.g. something like:
>>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> index fa6a018b20a8..cee08466a069 100644
>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> @@ -2431,6 +2431,9 @@ static unsigned int
>> khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, enum scan_result
>> unsigned long hstart, hend;
>> cond_resched();
>> + if (try_to_freeze())
>> + break;
>> +
>> if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm))) {
>> progress++;
>> break;
>> @@ -2453,6 +2456,9 @@ static unsigned int
>> khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, enum scan_result
>> bool mmap_locked = true;
>> cond_resched();
>> + if (try_to_freeze())
>> + goto breakouterloop;
>> +
>> if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm)))
>> goto breakouterloop;
>
> This looks better than the previous version. Let’s also wait to see if
> others have any better suggestions.
What prevents other callpaths (faults, read(), write(), etc) from
similarly triggering swapin?
I recall that there is a notifier when the system is preparing to sleep
(pm notifier or something). Could we simply hook into that to tell
khugepaged to suspend+resume?
Essentially, making hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable() break our for us.
--
Cheers,
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists