[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260206091751.3973615-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 10:17:30 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@...gle.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: add explicit padding to struct kvm_s390_keyop
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
The newly added structure causes a warning about implied padding:
./usr/include/linux/kvm.h:1247:1: error: padding struct size to alignment boundary with 6 bytes [-Werror=padded]
The padding can lead to leaking kernel data and ABI incompatibilies
when used on x86. Neither of these is a problem in this specific
patch, but it's best to avoid it and use explicit padding fields
in general.
Fixes: 0ee4ddc1647b ("KVM: s390: Storage key manipulation IOCTL")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
I have a long series to add annotations to all existing structures,
but that will take a while. For now, I'm sending fixes when new
instances show up in linux-next.
---
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index a68b1741045c..1225fbd017e5 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -1255,6 +1255,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_keyop {
__u64 guest_addr;
__u8 key;
__u8 operation;
+ __u8 pad[6];
};
/*
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists