lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e6337ec-d4a0-420b-bd7b-0fd2b6fee620@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 11:21:19 +0000
From: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
To: Thaumy Cheng <thaumy.love@...il.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
 Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>,
 Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf/core: Fix missing read event generation on task
 exit



On 24/10/2025 6:05 pm, Thaumy Cheng wrote:
> For events with inherit_stat enabled, a "read" event will be generated
> to collect per task event counts on task exit.
> 
> The call chain is as follows:
> 
> do_exit
>    -> perf_event_exit_task
>      -> perf_event_exit_task_context
>        -> perf_event_exit_event
>          -> perf_remove_from_context
>            -> perf_child_detach
>              -> sync_child_event
>                -> perf_event_read_event
> 
> However, the child event context detaches the task too early in
> perf_event_exit_task_context, which causes sync_child_event to never
> generate the read event in this case, since child_event->ctx->task is
> always set to TASK_TOMBSTONE. Fix that by moving context lock section
> backward to ensure ctx->task is not set to TASK_TOMBSTONE before
> generating the read event.
> 
> Because perf_event_free_task calls perf_event_exit_task_context with
> exit = false to tear down all child events from the context, and the
> task never lived, accessing the task PID can lead to a use-after-free.
> 
> To fix that, let sync_child_event read task from argument and move the
> call to the only place it should be triggered to avoid the effect of
> setting ctx->task to TASK_TOMESTONE, and add a task parameter to
> perf_event_exit_event to trigger the sync_child_event properly when
> needed.
> 
> This bug can be reproduced by running "perf record -s" and attaching to
> any program that generates perf events in its child tasks. If we check
> the result with "perf report -T", the last line of the report will leave
> an empty table like "# PID  TID", which is expected to contain the
> per-task event counts by design.
> 
> Fixes: ef54c1a476ae ("perf: Rework perf_event_exit_event()")
> Signed-off-by: Thaumy Cheng <thaumy.love@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix the bug in a more direct way by moving the call to
>    sync_child_event and bring back the task param to
>    perf_event_exit_event.
>    This approach avoids the event unscheduling issue in v2.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Only trigger read event on task exit.
> - Rename perf_event_exit_event to perf_event_detach_event.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250817132742.85154-1-thaumy.love@gmail.com/
> 
> Changes in v1:
> - Set TASK_TOMBSTONE after the read event is tirggered.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250720000424.12572-1-thaumy.love@gmail.com/
> 
>   kernel/events/core.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 177e57c1a362..618e7947c358 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -2316,7 +2316,8 @@ static void perf_group_detach(struct perf_event *event)
>   	perf_event__header_size(leader);
>   }
> 
> -static void sync_child_event(struct perf_event *child_event);
> +static void sync_child_event(struct perf_event *child_event,
> +			     struct task_struct *task);
> 
>   static void perf_child_detach(struct perf_event *event)
>   {
> @@ -2336,7 +2337,6 @@ static void perf_child_detach(struct perf_event *event)
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&parent_event->child_mutex);
>   	 */
> 
> -	sync_child_event(event);
>   	list_del_init(&event->child_list);
>   }
> 
> @@ -4587,6 +4587,7 @@ static void perf_event_enable_on_exec(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
>   static void perf_remove_from_owner(struct perf_event *event);
>   static void perf_event_exit_event(struct perf_event *event,
>   				  struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> +				  struct task_struct *task,
>   				  bool revoke);
> 
>   /*
> @@ -4614,7 +4615,7 @@ static void perf_event_remove_on_exec(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
> 
>   		modified = true;
> 
> -		perf_event_exit_event(event, ctx, false);
> +		perf_event_exit_event(event, ctx, ctx->task, false);
>   	}
> 
>   	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
> @@ -12437,7 +12438,7 @@ static void __pmu_detach_event(struct pmu *pmu, struct perf_event *event,
>   	/*
>   	 * De-schedule the event and mark it REVOKED.
>   	 */
> -	perf_event_exit_event(event, ctx, true);
> +	perf_event_exit_event(event, ctx, ctx->task, true);
> 
>   	/*
>   	 * All _free_event() bits that rely on event->pmu:
> @@ -13994,14 +13995,13 @@ void perf_pmu_migrate_context(struct pmu *pmu, int src_cpu, int dst_cpu)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_pmu_migrate_context);
> 
> -static void sync_child_event(struct perf_event *child_event)
> +static void sync_child_event(struct perf_event *child_event,
> +			     struct task_struct *task)
>   {
>   	struct perf_event *parent_event = child_event->parent;
>   	u64 child_val;
> 
>   	if (child_event->attr.inherit_stat) {
> -		struct task_struct *task = child_event->ctx->task;
> -
>   		if (task && task != TASK_TOMBSTONE)
>   			perf_event_read_event(child_event, task);
>   	}
> @@ -14020,7 +14020,9 @@ static void sync_child_event(struct perf_event *child_event)
> 
>   static void
>   perf_event_exit_event(struct perf_event *event,
> -		      struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool revoke)
> +		      struct perf_event_context *ctx,
> +		      struct task_struct *task,
> +		      bool revoke)
>   {
>   	struct perf_event *parent_event = event->parent;
>   	unsigned long detach_flags = DETACH_EXIT;
> @@ -14043,6 +14045,9 @@ perf_event_exit_event(struct perf_event *event,
>   		mutex_lock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
>   		/* PERF_ATTACH_ITRACE might be set concurrently */
>   		attach_state = READ_ONCE(event->attach_state);
> +
> +		if (attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_CHILD)
> +			sync_child_event(event, task);

Hi Thaumy and Peter,

I've been looking into a regression caused by this commit and didn't 
manage to come up with a fix. But shouldn't this be something more like:

   if (attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_CHILD && event_filter_match(event))
       sync_child_event(event, task);

As in, you only want to call sync_child_event() and write stuff to the 
ring buffer for the CPU that is currently running this exit handler? 
Although this change affects the 'total_time_enabled' tracking as well, 
but I'm not 100% sure if we're not double counting it anyway.

 From perf_event_exit_task_context(), perf_event_exit_event() is called 
on all events, which includes events on other CPUs:

   list_for_each_entry_safe(child_event, next, &ctx->event_list, ...)
     perf_event_exit_event(child_event, ctx, exit ? task : NULL, false);

Then we write into those other CPU's ring buffers, which don't support 
concurrency.

The reason I found this is because we have a tracing test that spawns 
some threads and then looks for PERF_RECORD_AUX events. When there are 
concurrent writes into the ring buffers, rb->nest tracking gets messed 
up leaving the count positive even after all nested writers have 
finished. Then all future writes don't copy the data_head pointer to the 
user page (because it thinks someone else is writing), so Perf doesn't 
copy out any data anymore leaving records missing.

An easy reproducer is to put a warning that the ring buffer being 
written to is the correct one:

   @@ -41,10 +41,11 @@ static void perf_output_get_handle(struct
   perf_output_handle *handle)
   {
  	struct perf_buffer *rb = handle->rb;

  	preempt_disable();

   +	WARN_ON(handle->event->cpu != smp_processor_id());


And then record:

   perf record -s -- stress -c 8 -t 1

Which results in:

   perf_output_begin+0x320/0x480 (P)
   perf_event_exit_event+0x178/0x2c0
   perf_event_exit_task_context+0x214/0x2f0
   perf_event_exit_task+0xb0/0x3b0
   do_exit+0x1bc/0x808
   __arm64_sys_exit+0x28/0x30
   invoke_syscall+0x4c/0xe8
   el0_svc_common+0x9c/0xf0
   do_el0_svc+0x28/0x40
   el0_svc+0x50/0x240
   el0t_64_sync_handler+0x78/0x130
   el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x1a0

I suppose there is a chance that this is only an issue when also doing 
perf_aux_output_begin()/perf_aux_output_end() from start/stop because 
that's where I saw the real race? Maybe without that, accessing the rb 
from another CPU is ok because there is some locking, but I think this 
might be a more general issue.

Thanks
James


>   	}
> 
>   	if (revoke)
> @@ -14134,7 +14139,7 @@ static void perf_event_exit_task_context(struct task_struct *task, bool exit)
>   		perf_event_task(task, ctx, 0);
> 
>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(child_event, next, &ctx->event_list, event_entry)
> -		perf_event_exit_event(child_event, ctx, false);
> +		perf_event_exit_event(child_event, ctx, exit ? task : NULL, false);
> 
>   	mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
> 
> --
> 2.51.0
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ