[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNh63kg7QNOVhn4As1nGBLDLEy72zaiz0i2+CZKe=f9WuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 12:20:24 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, pulehui@...wei.com,
puranjay@...nel.org, pjw@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, alex@...ti.fr, jiang.biao@...ux.dev,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: fsession support for riscv
Thank you for working on this!
On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 at 06:52, Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Implement bpf fsession for the riscv architecture.
>
> Menglong Dong (3):
> bpf,riscv: introduce emit_store_stack_imm64() for trampoline
> bpf,riscv: add fsession support for trampolines
> selftests/bpf: enable fsession_test on riscv64
I'm happy with either addressing Leon's comment with a follow-up, or
spinning a V2.
For this version plus Leon's nit as a follow-up, or a V2:
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org> # QEMU/RVA23/DT
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists