[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260206012743.2617945-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 17:27:43 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Zecheng Li <zli94@...u.edu>,
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf annotate: Fix register usage in data type profiling
On data type profiling, it tried to match register name with a partial
string. For example, it allowed to match with "%rbp)" or "%rdi,8)".
But with recent change in the area, it doesn't match anymore and break
the data type profiling.
Let's pass the correct register name by removing the unwanted part. Add
arch__dwarf_regnum() to handle it in a single place.
Reported-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@...il.com>
Closes: 7d3n23li6drroxrdlpxn7ixehdeszkjdftah3zyngjl2qs22ef@...cjv53v42o
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 880b1bd300c21e67..2e3522905046c1ec 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -2447,6 +2447,29 @@ int annotate_check_args(void)
return 0;
}
+static int arch__dwarf_regnum(const struct arch *arch, const char *str)
+{
+ const char *p;
+ char *regname, *q;
+ int reg;
+
+ p = strchr(str, arch->objdump.register_char);
+ if (p == NULL)
+ return -1;
+
+ regname = strdup(p);
+ if (regname == NULL)
+ return -1;
+
+ q = strpbrk(regname, ",) ");
+ if (q)
+ *q = '\0';
+
+ reg = get_dwarf_regnum(regname, arch->id.e_machine, arch->id.e_flags);
+ free(regname);
+ return reg;
+}
+
/*
* Get register number and access offset from the given instruction.
* It assumes AT&T x86 asm format like OFFSET(REG). Maybe it needs
@@ -2457,7 +2480,6 @@ static int extract_reg_offset(const struct arch *arch, const char *str,
struct annotated_op_loc *op_loc)
{
char *p;
- char *regname;
if (arch->objdump.register_char == 0)
return -1;
@@ -2482,31 +2504,14 @@ static int extract_reg_offset(const struct arch *arch, const char *str,
}
op_loc->offset = strtol(str, &p, 0);
-
- p = strchr(p, arch->objdump.register_char);
- if (p == NULL)
+ op_loc->reg1 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, p);
+ if (op_loc->reg1 == -1)
return -1;
- regname = strdup(p);
- if (regname == NULL)
- return -1;
-
- op_loc->reg1 = get_dwarf_regnum(regname, arch->id.e_machine, arch->id.e_flags);
- free(regname);
-
/* Get the second register */
- if (op_loc->multi_regs) {
- p = strchr(p + 1, arch->objdump.register_char);
- if (p == NULL)
- return -1;
-
- regname = strdup(p);
- if (regname == NULL)
- return -1;
+ if (op_loc->multi_regs)
+ op_loc->reg2 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, p + 1);
- op_loc->reg2 = get_dwarf_regnum(regname, arch->id.e_machine, arch->id.e_flags);
- free(regname);
- }
return 0;
}
@@ -2585,7 +2590,8 @@ int annotate_get_insn_location(const struct arch *arch, struct disasm_line *dl,
op_loc->multi_regs = multi_regs;
extract_reg_offset(arch, insn_str, op_loc);
} else {
- char *s, *p = NULL;
+ const char *s = insn_str;
+ char *p = NULL;
if (arch__is_x86(arch)) {
/* FIXME: Handle other segment registers */
@@ -2599,21 +2605,14 @@ int annotate_get_insn_location(const struct arch *arch, struct disasm_line *dl,
}
}
- s = strdup(insn_str);
- if (s == NULL)
- return -1;
-
if (*s == arch->objdump.register_char) {
- op_loc->reg1 = get_dwarf_regnum(s,
- arch->id.e_machine,
- arch->id.e_flags);
+ op_loc->reg1 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, s);
}
else if (*s == arch->objdump.imm_char) {
op_loc->offset = strtol(s + 1, &p, 0);
if (p && p != s + 1)
op_loc->imm = true;
}
- free(s);
}
}
--
2.53.0.rc2.204.g2597b5adb4-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists