linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad4030: Add ADAQ4216 and ADAQ4224

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aYXq0ZSRSa_dBwWs@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 10:21:21 -0300
From: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jic23@...nel.org,
	michael.hennerich@...log.com, nuno.sa@...log.com,
	eblanc@...libre.com, dlechner@...libre.com, andy@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad4030: Add ADAQ4216
 and ADAQ4224

On 02/06, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 01:48:55PM -0300, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> > ADAQ4216 and ADAQ4224 are similar to AD4030 except that ADAQ devices have a
> > PGA (programmable gain amplifier) that scales the input signal prior to it
> > reaching the ADC inputs. The PGA is controlled through a couple of pins (A0
> > and A1) that set one of four possible signal gain configurations.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>
> > ---
...
> >  
> > -oneOf:
> > -  - required:
> > -      - ref-supply
> > -  - required:
> > -      - refin-supply
> > +allOf:
> > +  - oneOf:
> > +      - required:
> > +          - ref-supply
> > +      - required:
> > +          - refin-supply
> 
> Why is this moved under the allOf?

I missed the immutable branch with spi-multi-lane change set provided by Mark.
Am rebasing on top of that for v8 and will solve the this and other
issues reported by dt_binding_check.

Thanks