[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66af2e9a17dab9f1ef79ad5812ec91aa9c0be005.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2026 09:55:01 +0100
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>, Viacheslav Dubeyko
<slava@...eyko.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
frank.li@...o.com, jkoolstra@...all.nl, mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@...il.com,
shardul.b@...ricsoftware.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] hfs/hfsplus changes for 7.0-rc1
Hi Tetsuo,
On Sat, 2026-02-07 at 10:18 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2026/02/07 9:26, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> > Hello Linus,
> >
> > This pull request contains several fixes of syzbot reported
> > issues and HFS+ fixes of xfstests failures.
>
> Where is the flow for testing these patches in linux-next tree?
> Are HFS/HFS+ patches directly going to linux tree without testing
> in linux-next tree?
The HFS/HFS+ tree should be part of linux-next which is why it's got
a branch named like this [1].
Adrian
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vdubeyko/hfs.git/log/?h=for-next
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists