[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <957068ee-7368-4fd1-9e55-1449414238be@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2026 07:07:13 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 10251/12094] drivers/hwmon/cros_ec_hwmon.o:
error: objtool: cros_ec_hwmon_read+0x6c: can't find jump dest instruction at
.text+0xd2d
On 2/7/26 02:56, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2026-02-07 13:14:53+0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>> head: 9845cf73f7db6094c0d8419d6adb848028f4a921
>> commit: 165c14597d53cfa7bc97b4ff8bc85f7bd98262b7 [10251/12094] hwmon: (cros_ec) Add support for temperature thresholds
>> config: x86_64-randconfig-071-20260207 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260207/202602071311.Q6tATiyh-lkp@intel.com/config)
>> compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260207/202602071311.Q6tATiyh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>>
>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602071311.Q6tATiyh-lkp@intel.com/
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>>> drivers/hwmon/cros_ec_hwmon.o: error: objtool: cros_ec_hwmon_read+0x6c: can't find jump dest instruction at .text+0xd2d
>
> This is due to the call to unreachable() in cros_ec_hwmon_attr_to_thres().
> Replacing it with BUG() avoids the issue.
>
> Guenter, do you want to drop the patches for now and I'll resend them
> next cycle? I can also send an incremental patch. Or you just fix it up
> in your branch.
>
I strongly dislike BUG() because it means "I don't trust my own code".
The final "else" in the code is not really necessary and should be dropped.
I can do that if you like, but I won't introduce BUG().
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists