[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPVz0n2KwqPw88JVcPzhTQ2n+GKzahkrEThjjrqm0CSdjKTEOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2026 19:25:25 +0200
From: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dixit Parmar <dixitparmar19@...il.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: regulator: cpcap-regulator: convert
to DT schema
сб, 7 лют. 2026 р. о 19:19 David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> пише:
>
> On 2/7/26 3:20 AM, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > сб, 7 лют. 2026 р. о 01:09 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> пише:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 07:28:35PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> >>> Convert devicetree bindings for the Motorola CPCAP MFD regulator subnode
> >>> from TXT to YAML format. Main functionality preserved.
> >>>
>
> ...
>
> >>> +properties:
> >>> + compatible:
> >>> + enum:
> >>> + - motorola,cpcap-regulator
> >>> + - motorola,mapphone-cpcap-regulator
> >>> + - motorola,xoom-cpcap-regulator
> >>> +
> >>> + regulators:
> >>> + type: object
> >>> +
> >>> + patternProperties:
> >>> + "$[A-Z0-9]+^":
> >>
> >> I thought it was said on the last version to list the names. Considering
> >> you already have them below, better to put them in schema than prose.
> >> And pretty much all regulator bindings define the names.
> >>
> >
> > What exactly do you propose? All those names will not fit into a
> > single unbreakable line (more than 125 columns in length btw). Patch
> > checker will complain about this. Duplicate pattern properties for
> > every few names? Please be a bit more specific. Thank you!
>
> Making checkpatch happy is not a hard requirement. If you have to
> go over 125 characters for technical reasons, no one is going to
> complain.
>
> I already gave an example on the last version. It is just a regex
> expression. (And note that you didn't fix the $ and ^ either. ^
> means beginning of the line and $ means the end of the line. So
> the pattern currently won't match anything.)
>
> patternProperties:
> "^(SW1|SW2|SW3|SW4|SW5|...)$":
>
>
> And I hope it is obvious that you are meant to replace ... with the
> rest of the names separated by |.
>
David, thank you for your suggestions and I did not want to offend you
nor Rob, or ignore. Using this large string IMHO feels a bit wrong. No
offence, I will use it if required. At the same time I was
experimenting with possible representation and come up with smth like
this:
patternProperties:
"^SW[1-6]$":
type: object
$ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
unevaluatedProperties: false
required:
- regulator-name
- regulator-enable-ramp-delay
- regulator-min-microvolt
- regulator-max-microvolt
"^V(CAM|CSI|DAC|DIG|FUSE|HVIO|SDIO|PLL|RF1|RF2|RFREF)$":
type: object
$ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
unevaluatedProperties: false
required:
- regulator-name
- regulator-enable-ramp-delay
- regulator-min-microvolt
- regulator-max-microvolt
"^V(WLAN1|WLAN2|SIM|SIMCARD|VIB|USB|AUDIO)$":
type: object
$ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
unevaluatedProperties: false
required:
- regulator-name
- regulator-enable-ramp-delay
- regulator-min-microvolt
- regulator-max-microvolt
Will this be acceptable? It passes checks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists