[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67577c238ead009b3b061a43d443dc69da2aee64.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2026 08:36:05 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Neel Bullywon <neelb2403@...il.com>, apw@...onical.com
Cc: dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: suggest fsleep() for short msleep() calls
On Sun, 2026-02-08 at 10:59 -0500, Neel Bullywon wrote:
> Update the MSLEEP warning to suggest fsleep() as a duration based
> sleep API. fsleep() autoselects the best sleep mechanism (udelay,
> usleep_range, or msleep) based on the requested duration, making
> it the preferred replacement for short msleep() calls.
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -6636,7 +6636,7 @@ sub process {
> if ($line =~ /\bmsleep\s*\((\d+)\);/) {
> if ($1 < 20) {
> WARN("MSLEEP",
> - "msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms; see function description of msleep().\n" . $herecurr);
> + "msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms; see function description of fsleep().\n" . $herecurr);
> }
> }
maybe change msleep to a #define macro so if the argument is
constant call fsleep instead
Something like:
#define msleep(msecs) \
do { \
if (__builtin_constant_p(msecs) && (msecs) < 20) \
fsleep((msecs) * 1000UL); \
else \
msleep(msecs); \
} while (0)
and change the definition of void msleep(unsigned int msecs) to
void (msleep)(unsigned int msecs)
{
etc...
}
and remove the checkpatch test.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists