linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: qualcomm: add bindings for QCC2072

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6def8756-f4c0-4b4d-a20a-205d548acf88@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 17:08:45 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Sahu <vivek.sahu@....qualcomm.com>,
 Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
 Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>, Rob Herring
 <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>,
 Balakrishna Godavarthi <quic_bgodavar@...cinc.com>,
 Rocky Liao <quic_rjliao@...cinc.com>
Cc: quic_mohamull@...cinc.com, quic_hbandi@...cinc.com,
 linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: qualcomm: add
 bindings for QCC2072

On 09/02/2026 16:43, Vivek Sahu wrote:
> 
> On 2/9/2026 1:37 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 09/02/2026 09:06, Vivek Sahu wrote:
>>> QCC2072 is a WiFi/BT connectivity chip.
>>> It requires different firmware, so document it as a new compat string.
>>>
>>> Correct the sorting of other chipsets for better readability.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Sahu <vivek.sahu@....qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml  | 3 ++-
>> There is no such file.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> The patch is updated on 
> "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git" repo 

This is not correct base. Why would you base on something old, without
any in-flight accepted patches?

You are supposed to work on maintainer's tree.

Best regards,
Krzysztof