[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYoURlMX4UQJsekN@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 17:07:18 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Yury Norov <ynorov@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the
mm-nonmm-stable tree
On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 08:58:10AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:43:49 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > between commit:
> >
> > 86e685ff364394 ("tracing: remove size parameter in __trace_puts()")
> >
> > from the mm-nonmm-stable tree and commits:
> >
> > 27931ee8f45415 ("tracing: Move trace_printk functions out of trace.c and into trace_printk.c")
> > 0e730bc067e7a7 ("tracing: Move __trace_buffer_{un}lock_*() functions to trace.h")
> >
> > from the ftrace tree.
> Yikes.
> How about I drop "tracing: remove size parameter in __trace_puts()" and
> "tracing: move tracing declarations from kernel.h to a dedicated
> header"?
FWIW that diffstat looked a lot worse than it was since it was one of
these git shows as an empty diff and I used diff -c instead which
usually looks more alarming - the change was trivial code motion
deleting code in the ftrace tree with the actual fixup being very small
but in a different file. Was a bit weird that the parameter removal
didn't go via the ftrace tree though.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists