[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYoh4RKXOoezheVj@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 18:05:25 +0000 (UTC)
From: Matt Wardle <matt@...twardle.net>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: media: atomisp: Fix braces on incorrect
lines
On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 05:42:06PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 02:29:07PM +0000, Matt Wardle wrote:
> > Fix checkpatch.pl errors:
> >
> > ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
> > ERROR: that open brace { should be on the previous line
>
> Nice! My comments below.
>
> ...
>
> > store_dvs_6axis_config(
>
> > const struct ia_css_dvs_6axis_config *dvs_6axis_config,
> > const struct ia_css_binary *binary,
> > const struct ia_css_frame_info *dvs_in_frame_info,
> > - ia_css_ptr ddr_addr_y) {
> > + ia_css_ptr ddr_addr_y)
> > +{
>
> This makes no sense to touch before the parameters are indented correctly.
> I dunno if open parenthesis is fine at the end of the line, but I would do it
> differently, as
>
> store_dvs_6axis_config(const struct ia_css_dvs_6axis_config *dvs_6axis_config,
> const struct ia_css_binary *binary,
> ...)
> {
>
> ...
>
> The bottom line is, you need to check manually these and make prerequisite
> patch to first fix the indentation.
>
> ...
>
> > int
> > ia_css_get_dvs2_statistics(
> > struct ia_css_dvs2_statistics *host_stats,
> > - const struct ia_css_isp_dvs_statistics *isp_stats) {
> > + const struct ia_css_isp_dvs_statistics *isp_stats)
> > +{
>
> Ditto.
>
> And when you go with indentation it makes sense to combine (it's fine in this
> case) those changes with the splitting { to the next line.
Thanks, I'll fix the indentation first on the functions then resubmit
without the last patch.
This is happening in many files so it might be best I tackle the other
occurences in a separate patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists