lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1e1eeea-b246-42c8-84c9-0c1203706ddc@lucaweiss.eu>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 21:45:02 +0100
From: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger
 <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Add mt8516-syscfg

Hi AngeloGioacchino,

On 09-02-2026 12:34, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 07/02/26 11:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>> On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 11:20:48AM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> Document the Mediatek mt8516-syscfg.
>>
>> Which is what? What is syscfg block?
>>
> 
> Not sure this is really a SYSCFG block.
> 
> This should be a GPIO controller range, which is split between IOCFG and 
> EINT.
> Now, the legacy drivers are declaring the EINT iospace in the pinctrl 
> node, and
> getting the GPIO controller (IOCFG) iospace from a regmap.
> 
> I don't have any board with MT8516... but well, the really-right-thing 
> to do
> would be to migrate that SoC off of the legacy driver, to the new-style one
> that *properly* takes two iospaces:
> "base" -> (0x10005000)
> "eint" -> (0x1000b000)
> 
> Luca, if you've got such a board, could you please try to migrate this 
> SoC out
> of the improper (but working good) driver and bindings?
> 
> If not... well, I think this block is IOCFG, not SYSCFG...

Thanks for the suggestions. This is essentially my first Mediatek patch 
and while I'd say I have a good understanding of Qualcomm SoCs, Mediatek 
is very different, so I've got no clue about anything here really ;)

I'll try to decipher your comment and see what I can do about it, 
hopefully soon. Thanks!

Regards
Luca

> 
> Cheers,
> Angelo
> 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml | 2 ++
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml b/ 
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
>>> index e57add2bacd3..a67699f1faee 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml
>>> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ select:
>>>             - mediatek,mt8135-pctl-b-syscfg
>>>             - mediatek,mt8173-pctl-a-syscfg
>>>             - mediatek,mt8365-syscfg
>>> +          - mediatek,mt8516-syscfg
>>
>> Why aren't you placing it with all others mediatek,mt8516 syscons?
>>
>> Why this is so generically called "syscfg", completely not looking like
>> a real name from datasheet unlike the others in this device.
>>
>> You have entire commit msg to explain that.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ