lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fV6WRASqp=HCTF1E64cDJy_mJrESMLYiyydwj0hGoYsDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 14:09:33 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, 
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zide Chen <zide.chen@...el.com>, 
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@...el.com>, Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>, 
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 1/4] perf headers: Sync with the kernel headers

On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 12:39 AM Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Update include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h and
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h to support extended regs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h       | 45 +++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index 7c9d2bb3833b..6da63e1dbb40 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -27,9 +27,34 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
>         PERF_REG_X86_R13,
>         PERF_REG_X86_R14,
>         PERF_REG_X86_R15,
> +       /*
> +        * The EGPRs/SSP and XMM have overlaps. Only one can be used
> +        * at a time. For the ABI type PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD,
> +        * utilize EGPRs/SSP. For the other ABI type, XMM is used.
> +        *
> +        * Extended GPRs (EGPRs)
> +        */
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R16,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R17,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R18,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R19,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R20,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R21,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R22,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R23,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R24,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R25,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R26,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R27,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R28,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R29,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R30,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_R31,
> +       PERF_REG_X86_SSP,

nit: I think it'd be nice to comment that PERF_REG_X86_SSP and
PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 are both 32, the meaning of the register is
dependent on the PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD, 0 meaning XMM0 and 1
meaning SSP (which could be the opposite of what would be expected).

>         /* These are the limits for the GPRs. */
>         PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_GS + 1,
>         PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
> +       PERF_REG_MISC_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_SSP + 1,
>
>         /* These all need two bits set because they are 128bit */
>         PERF_REG_X86_XMM0  = 32,
> @@ -54,5 +79,29 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
>  };
>
>  #define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_XMM0) - 1))
> +#define PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK    GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_R31, PERF_REG_X86_R16)
> +
> +enum {
> +       PERF_X86_SIMD_XMM_REGS      = 16,
> +       PERF_X86_SIMD_YMM_REGS      = 16,
> +       PERF_X86_SIMD_ZMM_REGS      = 32,
> +       PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX  = PERF_X86_SIMD_ZMM_REGS,
> +
> +       PERF_X86_SIMD_OPMASK_REGS   = 8,
> +       PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_REGS_MAX = PERF_X86_SIMD_OPMASK_REGS,
> +};
> +
> +#define PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_MASK        GENMASK(PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
> +#define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
> +
> +#define PERF_X86_H16ZMM_BASE           16
> +
> +enum {
> +       PERF_X86_OPMASK_QWORDS   = 1,
> +       PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS      = 2,
> +       PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS      = 4,
> +       PERF_X86_ZMM_QWORDS      = 8,
> +       PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX = PERF_X86_ZMM_QWORDS,

nit: for a non-x86 audience who may think a word is more than 2 bytes,
I think it would be nice to comment that a QWORD is 8 bytes. I don't
see other mentions of the unit of length in the kernel headers.

> +};
>
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index 72f03153dd32..ce3a14d35390 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -314,8 +314,9 @@ enum {
>   */
>  enum perf_sample_regs_abi {
>         PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE               = 0,
> -       PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32                 = 1,
> -       PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64                 = 2,
> +       PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32                 = (1 << 0),
> +       PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64                 = (1 << 1),
> +       PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD               = (1 << 2),
>  };
>
>  /*
> @@ -383,6 +384,7 @@ enum perf_event_read_format {
>  #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER7                    128     /* Add: sig_data */
>  #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER8                    136     /* Add: config3 */
>  #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER9                    144     /* add: config4 */
> +#define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER10                   176     /* Add: sample_simd_{pred,vec}_reg_* */
>
>  /*
>   * 'struct perf_event_attr' contains various attributes that define
> @@ -547,6 +549,25 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
>
>         __u64   config3; /* extension of config2 */
>         __u64   config4; /* extension of config3 */
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Defines set of SIMD registers to dump on samples.
> +        * The sample_simd_regs_enabled !=0 implies the
> +        * set of SIMD registers is used to config all SIMD registers.
> +        * If !sample_simd_regs_enabled, sample_regs_XXX may be used to
> +        * config some SIMD registers on X86.

nit: I think this comment could be clearer, perhaps:

If sample_simd_regs_enabled is non-zero then the following
sampled_simd values define a set of SIMD registers to dump in all
samples. Each register is defined as a bitmap position in
(pred|vec)_reg_(intr|user) and the width of the register in qwords
(8-bytes) is given in (pred|vec)_reg_qwords. If sample_simd_regs is 0
then the vector registers may be dumped if they are in use. To
determine if all or a subset of the registers are dumped, and the
register width, the sample contains the values nr_vectors,
vector_qwords, nr_pred and pred_qwords.

Note, it is particularly the notion of "config all SIMD registers"
that I'm having a hard time being clear on here.

> +        */
> +       union {
> +               __u16 sample_simd_regs_enabled;

nit: I wonder if "enabled" is the right name here as the value being 0
means the vector register may be dumped. Perhaps
sample_simd_regs_full.

Thanks,
Ian

> +               __u16 sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords;
> +       };
> +       __u16   sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords;
> +       __u32   __reserved_4;
> +
> +       __u32   sample_simd_pred_reg_intr;
> +       __u32   sample_simd_pred_reg_user;
> +       __u64   sample_simd_vec_reg_intr;
> +       __u64   sample_simd_vec_reg_user;
>  };
>
>  /*
> @@ -1020,7 +1041,15 @@ enum perf_event_type {
>          *      } && PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK
>          *
>          *      { u64                   abi; # enum perf_sample_regs_abi
> -        *        u64                   regs[weight(mask)]; } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER
> +        *        u64                   regs[weight(mask)];
> +        *        struct {
> +        *              u16 nr_vectors;         # 0 ... weight(sample_simd_vec_reg_user)
> +        *              u16 vector_qwords;      # 0 ... sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords
> +        *              u16 nr_pred;            # 0 ... weight(sample_simd_pred_reg_user)
> +        *              u16 pred_qwords;        # 0 ... sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords
> +        *              u64 data[nr_vectors * vector_qwords + nr_pred * pred_qwords];
> +        *        } && (abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD)
> +        *      } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER
>          *
>          *      { u64                   size;
>          *        char                  data[size];
> @@ -1047,7 +1076,15 @@ enum perf_event_type {
>          *      { u64                   data_src; } && PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC
>          *      { u64                   transaction; } && PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION
>          *      { u64                   abi; # enum perf_sample_regs_abi
> -        *        u64                   regs[weight(mask)]; } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR
> +        *        u64                   regs[weight(mask)];
> +        *        struct {
> +        *              u16 nr_vectors;         # 0 ... weight(sample_simd_vec_reg_intr)
> +        *              u16 vector_qwords;      # 0 ... sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords
> +        *              u16 nr_pred;            # 0 ... weight(sample_simd_pred_reg_intr)
> +        *              u16 pred_qwords;        # 0 ... sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords
> +        *              u64 data[nr_vectors * vector_qwords + nr_pred * pred_qwords];
> +        *        } && (abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD)
> +        *      } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR
>          *      { u64                   phys_addr;} && PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR
>          *      { u64                   cgroup;} && PERF_SAMPLE_CGROUP
>          *      { u64                   data_page_size;} && PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ