[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fV6WRASqp=HCTF1E64cDJy_mJrESMLYiyydwj0hGoYsDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 14:09:33 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zide Chen <zide.chen@...el.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@...el.com>, Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 1/4] perf headers: Sync with the kernel headers
On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 12:39 AM Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Update include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h and
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h to support extended regs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index 7c9d2bb3833b..6da63e1dbb40 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -27,9 +27,34 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
> PERF_REG_X86_R13,
> PERF_REG_X86_R14,
> PERF_REG_X86_R15,
> + /*
> + * The EGPRs/SSP and XMM have overlaps. Only one can be used
> + * at a time. For the ABI type PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD,
> + * utilize EGPRs/SSP. For the other ABI type, XMM is used.
> + *
> + * Extended GPRs (EGPRs)
> + */
> + PERF_REG_X86_R16,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R17,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R18,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R19,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R20,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R21,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R22,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R23,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R24,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R25,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R26,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R27,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R28,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R29,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R30,
> + PERF_REG_X86_R31,
> + PERF_REG_X86_SSP,
nit: I think it'd be nice to comment that PERF_REG_X86_SSP and
PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 are both 32, the meaning of the register is
dependent on the PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD, 0 meaning XMM0 and 1
meaning SSP (which could be the opposite of what would be expected).
> /* These are the limits for the GPRs. */
> PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_GS + 1,
> PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
> + PERF_REG_MISC_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_SSP + 1,
>
> /* These all need two bits set because they are 128bit */
> PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 = 32,
> @@ -54,5 +79,29 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
> };
>
> #define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_XMM0) - 1))
> +#define PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_R31, PERF_REG_X86_R16)
> +
> +enum {
> + PERF_X86_SIMD_XMM_REGS = 16,
> + PERF_X86_SIMD_YMM_REGS = 16,
> + PERF_X86_SIMD_ZMM_REGS = 32,
> + PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX = PERF_X86_SIMD_ZMM_REGS,
> +
> + PERF_X86_SIMD_OPMASK_REGS = 8,
> + PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_REGS_MAX = PERF_X86_SIMD_OPMASK_REGS,
> +};
> +
> +#define PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_MASK GENMASK(PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
> +#define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
> +
> +#define PERF_X86_H16ZMM_BASE 16
> +
> +enum {
> + PERF_X86_OPMASK_QWORDS = 1,
> + PERF_X86_XMM_QWORDS = 2,
> + PERF_X86_YMM_QWORDS = 4,
> + PERF_X86_ZMM_QWORDS = 8,
> + PERF_X86_SIMD_QWORDS_MAX = PERF_X86_ZMM_QWORDS,
nit: for a non-x86 audience who may think a word is more than 2 bytes,
I think it would be nice to comment that a QWORD is 8 bytes. I don't
see other mentions of the unit of length in the kernel headers.
> +};
>
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index 72f03153dd32..ce3a14d35390 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -314,8 +314,9 @@ enum {
> */
> enum perf_sample_regs_abi {
> PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE = 0,
> - PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32 = 1,
> - PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64 = 2,
> + PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32 = (1 << 0),
> + PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64 = (1 << 1),
> + PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD = (1 << 2),
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -383,6 +384,7 @@ enum perf_event_read_format {
> #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER7 128 /* Add: sig_data */
> #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER8 136 /* Add: config3 */
> #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER9 144 /* add: config4 */
> +#define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER10 176 /* Add: sample_simd_{pred,vec}_reg_* */
>
> /*
> * 'struct perf_event_attr' contains various attributes that define
> @@ -547,6 +549,25 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
>
> __u64 config3; /* extension of config2 */
> __u64 config4; /* extension of config3 */
> +
> + /*
> + * Defines set of SIMD registers to dump on samples.
> + * The sample_simd_regs_enabled !=0 implies the
> + * set of SIMD registers is used to config all SIMD registers.
> + * If !sample_simd_regs_enabled, sample_regs_XXX may be used to
> + * config some SIMD registers on X86.
nit: I think this comment could be clearer, perhaps:
If sample_simd_regs_enabled is non-zero then the following
sampled_simd values define a set of SIMD registers to dump in all
samples. Each register is defined as a bitmap position in
(pred|vec)_reg_(intr|user) and the width of the register in qwords
(8-bytes) is given in (pred|vec)_reg_qwords. If sample_simd_regs is 0
then the vector registers may be dumped if they are in use. To
determine if all or a subset of the registers are dumped, and the
register width, the sample contains the values nr_vectors,
vector_qwords, nr_pred and pred_qwords.
Note, it is particularly the notion of "config all SIMD registers"
that I'm having a hard time being clear on here.
> + */
> + union {
> + __u16 sample_simd_regs_enabled;
nit: I wonder if "enabled" is the right name here as the value being 0
means the vector register may be dumped. Perhaps
sample_simd_regs_full.
Thanks,
Ian
> + __u16 sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords;
> + };
> + __u16 sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords;
> + __u32 __reserved_4;
> +
> + __u32 sample_simd_pred_reg_intr;
> + __u32 sample_simd_pred_reg_user;
> + __u64 sample_simd_vec_reg_intr;
> + __u64 sample_simd_vec_reg_user;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -1020,7 +1041,15 @@ enum perf_event_type {
> * } && PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK
> *
> * { u64 abi; # enum perf_sample_regs_abi
> - * u64 regs[weight(mask)]; } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER
> + * u64 regs[weight(mask)];
> + * struct {
> + * u16 nr_vectors; # 0 ... weight(sample_simd_vec_reg_user)
> + * u16 vector_qwords; # 0 ... sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords
> + * u16 nr_pred; # 0 ... weight(sample_simd_pred_reg_user)
> + * u16 pred_qwords; # 0 ... sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords
> + * u64 data[nr_vectors * vector_qwords + nr_pred * pred_qwords];
> + * } && (abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD)
> + * } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER
> *
> * { u64 size;
> * char data[size];
> @@ -1047,7 +1076,15 @@ enum perf_event_type {
> * { u64 data_src; } && PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC
> * { u64 transaction; } && PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION
> * { u64 abi; # enum perf_sample_regs_abi
> - * u64 regs[weight(mask)]; } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR
> + * u64 regs[weight(mask)];
> + * struct {
> + * u16 nr_vectors; # 0 ... weight(sample_simd_vec_reg_intr)
> + * u16 vector_qwords; # 0 ... sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords
> + * u16 nr_pred; # 0 ... weight(sample_simd_pred_reg_intr)
> + * u16 pred_qwords; # 0 ... sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords
> + * u64 data[nr_vectors * vector_qwords + nr_pred * pred_qwords];
> + * } && (abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD)
> + * } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR
> * { u64 phys_addr;} && PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR
> * { u64 cgroup;} && PERF_SAMPLE_CGROUP
> * { u64 data_page_size;} && PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists