[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260209072047.2180332-6-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:20:30 +0800
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
broonie@...nel.org,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@...el.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@...el.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v6 05/22] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
More and more regs will be supported in the overflow, e.g., more vector
registers, SSP, etc. The generic pt_regs struct cannot store all of
them. Use a X86 specific x86_perf_regs instead.
The struct pt_regs *regs is still passed to x86_pmu_handle_irq(). There
is no functional change for the existing code.
AMD IBS's NMI handler doesn't utilize the static call
x86_pmu_handle_irq(). The x86_perf_regs struct doesn't apply to the AMD
IBS. It can be added separately later when AMD IBS supports more regs.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 6df73e8398cd..8c80d22864d8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -1785,6 +1785,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM(perf_put_guest_lvtpc);
static int
perf_event_nmi_handler(unsigned int cmd, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ struct x86_perf_regs x86_regs;
u64 start_clock;
u64 finish_clock;
int ret;
@@ -1808,7 +1809,8 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(unsigned int cmd, struct pt_regs *regs)
return NMI_DONE;
start_clock = sched_clock();
- ret = static_call(x86_pmu_handle_irq)(regs);
+ x86_regs.regs = *regs;
+ ret = static_call(x86_pmu_handle_irq)(&x86_regs.regs);
finish_clock = sched_clock();
perf_sample_event_took(finish_clock - start_clock);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists