[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYme6jXNyPM_AHo-@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 10:46:34 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Yasin Lee <yasin.lee.x@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, yasin.lee.x@...look.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] iio: proximity: hx9023s: Protect against division by
zero in set_samp_freq
On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 11:37:03AM +0800, Yasin Lee wrote:
> Avoid division by zero when sampling frequency is unspecified by
> falling back to a default 100ms sampling period.
Fixes tag?
...
> + if (!val && !val2)
What's wrong with the positive conditional?
if (val || val2)
...
else
...
> + /* Fallback to a safe default sampling period */
> + period_ms = 100;
> + else
> + period_ms = div_u64(NANO, (val * MEGA + val2));
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists