[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d9cada8-7148-4a5c-a09d-120ef54559d7@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 11:24:05 +0100
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@...nel.org>
To: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, npache@...hat.com, ryan.roberts@....com,
dev.jain@....com, baohua@...nel.org, ackerleytng@...gle.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, michael.roth@....com,
vannapurve@...gle.com
Cc: ziy@...dia.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+33a04338019ac7e43a44@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: thp: Deny THP for guest_memfd and secretmem in
file_thp_enabled()
On 2/9/26 04:35, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> file_thp_enabled() incorrectly returns true for guest_memfd and secretmem
> inodes because they appear as regular read-only files when
> CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS is enabled. This allows khugepaged and
> MADV_COLLAPSE to create large folios in the page cache, but their fault
> handlers do not support large folios.
>
> Add explicit checks for GUEST_MEMFD_MAGIC and SECRETMEM_MAGIC to reject
> these filesystems early in file_thp_enabled().
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+33a04338019ac7e43a44@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=33a04338019ac7e43a44
> Tested-by: syzbot+33a04338019ac7e43a44@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <Kartikey406@...il.com>
So we were able to reproduce this with secretmem, right?
We want to add "Fixes:" for the introducing commits, which would be he
commits that enable secretmem and mapping of guest_memfd pages to user
space. Can you identify them?
And also
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 40cf59301c21..4f57c78b57dd 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ static inline bool file_thp_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> return false;
>
> inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file);
> + if (inode->i_sb->s_magic == GUEST_MEMFD_MAGIC ||
> + inode->i_sb->s_magic == SECRETMEM_MAGIC)
> + return false;
That's nasty. We want some way to identify that through the mapping.
Unfortunately CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS ignores any
mapping_set_large_folios() configs by design.
And CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS might go away soon, but we need a fix
until then.
While we can identify secretmem through vma_is_secretmem(), we can't do
the same for guest_memfd as it's built as a module.
Unfortunately AS_NO_DIRECT_MAP[1] won't work.
Maybe introduce a AS_NO_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS, which we can just easily
rip out along with CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS later?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260126164445.11867-6-kalyazin@amazon.com
--
Cheers,
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists