lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYm2gm6PlKO2ODll@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 12:27:14 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Dixit Parmar <dixitparmar19@...il.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration
 per-board

On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> пн, 9 лют. 2026 р. о 10:55 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> пише:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 10:42:02AM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > 9 лютого 2026 р. 10:18:57 GMT+02:00, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> пише:
> > > >On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 05:19:49PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > >> 8 лютого 2026 р. 14:54:53 GMT+02:00, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> пише:
> > > >> >On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 07:28:44PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:

...

> > > >> And please, may you contain all your reviewing in one iteration. Then both of
> > > >> us will spend less time working on the patch. Thank you!
> > > >
> > > >It's an impossible request, you should understand that. If you want, use AI
> > > >or your robot colleagues for that, I'm just a human being, I can't see
> > > >everything at once.
> > >
> > > Ability to see only nits and don't see the possible issues seems to be a talent.
> >
> > Paying respect to the reviewers requires some talent, indeed.

...

> > Also, train your logic a bit, why do humans have so many professions? According
> > to your "logic" one should be a doctor and a cook and a programmer. Why not?
> >
> > Or even closer to this case, a doctor must be a surgeon, a dentist, a therapist,
> > and you name it. Why not?
> 
> If seems that my expectations were too high. Apologies, my mistake. I
> will keep in mind to spare you from wasting your time on reviewing my
> patches in the future.

Yeah, I agree, I think the AI approach to your excellent and mistake-less code
can be applied with a better outcome.

...

Currently your code needs some work, sorry.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ