[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DGAFT3L8L5DO.FU8O3M5KTJ40@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 13:41:21 +0100
From: "Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
To: "Osama Abdelkader" <osama.abdelkader@...il.com>, "Inki Dae"
<inki.dae@...sung.com>, "Jagan Teki" <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>, "Marek
Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, "Andrzej Hajda"
<andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, "Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
"Robert Foss" <rfoss@...nel.org>, "Laurent Pinchart"
<Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, "Jonas Karlman" <jonas@...boo.se>,
"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, "Maarten Lankhorst"
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@...e.de>, "David Airlie"
<airlied@...il.com>, "Simona Vetter" <simona@...ll.ch>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix memory leak in error path
Hello Osama,
On Sat Feb 7, 2026 at 7:37 PM CET, Osama Abdelkader wrote:
> In samsung_dsim_host_attach(), drm_bridge_add() is called to add the
> bridge. However, if samsung_dsim_register_te_irq() or
> pdata->host_ops->attach() fails afterwards, the function returns
> without removing the bridge, causing a memory leak.
>
> Fix this by adding proper error handling with goto labels to ensure
> drm_bridge_remove() is called in all error paths. Also ensure that
> samsung_dsim_unregister_te_irq() is called if the attach operation
> fails after the TE IRQ has been registered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@...il.com>
Good catch!
However being a fix you need a 'Fixes:' line pointing to the first commit
where hte bug exists. At a quick search it looks like f9bfd326f57e, but
please double check that. And with a Fixes tag you need Cc: stable, see the
docs [0].
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> @@ -1881,6 +1881,8 @@ static int samsung_dsim_register_te_irq(struct samsung_dsim *dsi, struct device
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void samsung_dsim_unregister_te_irq(struct samsung_dsim *dsi);
Please don't add a forward declaration. Just move
samsung_dsim_unregister_te_irq() function earlier, perhaps right here. Also
mention in the commit message that you have just moved it without changes,
to help reviewers: unfortunately code being moved it not very well
visualized in a diff.
Otherwise looks good!
It would be great if you please add me in Cc for future patches to this
driver. I'm using and touching it [1][2] so I'd like to review patches
touching it. Thanks!
[0] https://docs.kernel.org/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260109-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_of_find_bridge-2-v2-0-8bad3ef90b9f@bootlin.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260206-drm-bridge-atomic-vs-remove-clear_and_put-v1-2-6f1a7d03c45f@bootlin.com/
Luca
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists