linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for QCS8300

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <pfciamz5tzaacc7bzxy2rbtsa56smjlgi5nfb6ch4o64slyjbr@k2uyahxugjyq>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 16:19:12 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for QCS8300

On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 06:49:26PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/9/2026 6:11 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 04:59:47PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> > > Add support for the Qualcomm QCS8300 SoC to the protection
> > > domain mapper. QCS8300 share the same protection domain
> > > configuration as SC8280XP, except charger_pd.
> > > 
> > > Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid the need for userspace to
> > > provide this service.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@....qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 8 ++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> > > index 8b899ec7f..32538e659 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> > > @@ -413,6 +413,13 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs404_domains[] = {
> > >   	NULL,
> > >   };
> > > +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs8300_domains[] = {
> > > +	&adsp_audio_pd,
> > > +	&adsp_root_pd,
> > > +	&cdsp_root_pd,
> > 
> > No PD for GPDSP?
> > 
> 
> yes, There is no PD available for GPDSP in the Monaco linux‑firmware.

Why? What is the differece from GPDSP on Lemans?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry