[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PUZPR06MB58874435D76DB634D0A4A84DEF65A@PUZPR06MB5887.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 02:38:18 +0000
From: Gary Yang <gary.yang@...tech.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org"
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Peter Chen
<peter.chen@...tech.com>, "unicorn_wang@...look.com"
<unicorn_wang@...look.com>, "inochiama@...il.com" <inochiama@...il.com>,
"alchark@...il.com" <alchark@...il.com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, cix-kernel-upstream
<cix-kernel-upstream@...tech.com>
Subject:
回复: 回复: 回复: [PATCH v7 1/3] dt-bindings: soc: cix: document the simple-mfd syscon on Sky1 SoC
Hi Krzysztof:
Thanks for your comments
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
> On 06/02/2026 06:42, Gary Yang wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This yaml comes from microchip,mpfs-mss-top-sysreg.yaml as conor's
> >> suggestions on V3.
> >>> More info:
> >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20251124
> >>> 06 3235.952136-2-gary.yang@...tech.com/
> >>
> >> Please point to a specific message, not entire thread of 8 untrimmed replies.
> >>
> >
> > Please pay attention to these below:
> >
> >> Three, In corresponding driver files, we can get the regmap pointers via
> syscon API.
> >> All right? By the way, How should we describe syscon in yaml file? Are there
> some files used to refer?
> >
> > microchip,mpfs-mss-top-sysreg.yaml is one I wrote recently. Going to
> > the
>
> I do not understand why you are referring to this example. You did nothing like
> that.
>
> If you followed that example, it would be obviously fine because it is correct.
> You did not follow that one - you have no children here - thus you just proven
> that you received review which you just ignored. Sorry, that's waste of our time.
> If you go that way, don't be surprised we are grumpy. How many examples we
> need to give you which you can ignore...
>
I'm sorry. From see conor's advices, we carefully research this scheme. We all refer to this scheme from V4.
Although it becomes failure, we try our best to do it every time. we are closer to success than before. All right?
please give us more time to grow up. Thanks for your understandings.
Best Regards
Gary
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists