[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c3727f-2488-4f6e-aeea-984b3789e222@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 07:15:56 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sohil.mehta@...el.com, zhao1.liu@...el.com,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jon Kohler <jon@...anix.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [v2] x86/cpu: Take Intel platform into account for
old microcode checks
On 2/9/26 02:20, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
> Retested by fabricating the faulting scenario. After adding the patches the old
> microcode warning didn't appear and the microcode entry was correctly matched.
>
> Tested-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
>
> (resending due to lost in-reply-to)
Thank you for the tag and for retesting!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists