[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df876a6e-013c-4566-890d-7c1d662fced3@lucifer.local>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:21:58 +0000
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] export file_close_fd and task_work_add
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 01:45:40PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 11:53:19AM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 11:42:46AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 11:20:33AM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 10:51:26AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > > > > This exports the functionality needed by Binder to close file
> > > > > descriptors.
> > > > >
> > > > > When you send a fd over Binder, what happens is this:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. The sending process turns the fd into a struct file and stores it in
> > > > > the transaction object.
> > > > > 2. When the receiving process gets the message, the fd is installed as a
> > > > > fd into the current process.
> > > > > 3. When the receiving process is done handling the message, it tells
> > > > > Binder to clean up the transaction. As part of this, fds embedded in
> > > > > the transaction are closed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that it was not always implemented like this. Previously the
> > > > > sending process would install the fd directly into the receiving proc in
> > > > > step 1, but as discussed previously [1] this is not ideal and has since
> > > > > been changed so that fd install happens during receive.
> > > > >
> > > > > The functions being exported here are for closing the fd in step 3. They
> > > > > are required because closing a fd from an ioctl is in general not safe.
> > > > > This is to meet the requirements for using fdget(), which is used by the
> > > > > ioctl framework code before calling into the driver's implementation of
> > > > > the ioctl. Binder works around this with this sequence of operations:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. file_close_fd()
> > > > > 2. get_file()
> > > > > 3. filp_close()
> > > > > 4. task_work_add(current, TWA_RESUME)
> > > > > 5. <binder returns from ioctl>
> > > > > 6. fput()
> > > > >
> > > > > This ensures that when fput() is called in the task work, the fdget()
> > > > > that the ioctl framework code uses has already been fdput(), so if the
> > > > > fd being closed happens to be the same fd, then the fd is not closed
> > > > > in violation of the fdget() rules.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not really familiar with this mechanism but you're already talking about
> > > > this being a workaround so strikes me the correct thing to do is to find a way
> > > > to do this in the kernel sensibly rather than exporting internal implementation
> > > > details and doing it in binder.
> > >
> > > I did previously submit a patch that implemented this logic outside of
> > > Binder, but I was advised to move it into Binder.
> >
> > Right yeah that's just odd to me, we really do not want to be adding internal
> > implementation details to drivers.
> >
> > This is based on bitter experience of bugs being caused by drivers abusing every
> > interface they get, which is basically exactly what always happens, sadly.
> >
> > And out-of-tree is heavily discouraged.
> >
> > Also can we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES() for anything we do need to export to
> > make it explicitly only for binder, perhaps?
> >
> > >
> > > But I'm happy to submit a patch to extract this logic into some sort of
> > > close_fd_safe() method that can be called even if said fd is currently
> > > held using fdget().
> >
> > Yup, especially given Christian's view on the kernel task export here I think
> > that's a more sensible approach.
> >
> > But obviously I defer the sensible-ness of this to him as I am but an mm dev :)
>
> Quick sketch of how this would look:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
> index adde1e40cccd..6fb7175ff69b 100644
> --- a/drivers/android/binder.c
> +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,6 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> -#include <linux/task_work.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> #include <linux/ktime.h>
>
> @@ -1962,68 +1961,6 @@ static bool binder_validate_fixup(struct binder_proc *proc,
> return (fixup_offset >= last_min_offset);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * struct binder_task_work_cb - for deferred close
> - *
> - * @twork: callback_head for task work
> - * @file: file to close
> - *
> - * Structure to pass task work to be handled after
> - * returning from binder_ioctl() via task_work_add().
> - */
> -struct binder_task_work_cb {
> - struct callback_head twork;
> - struct file *file;
> -};
> -
> -/**
> - * binder_do_fd_close() - close list of file descriptors
> - * @twork: callback head for task work
> - *
> - * It is not safe to call ksys_close() during the binder_ioctl()
> - * function if there is a chance that binder's own file descriptor
> - * might be closed. This is to meet the requirements for using
> - * fdget() (see comments for __fget_light()). Therefore use
> - * task_work_add() to schedule the close operation once we have
> - * returned from binder_ioctl(). This function is a callback
> - * for that mechanism and does the actual ksys_close() on the
> - * given file descriptor.
> - */
> -static void binder_do_fd_close(struct callback_head *twork)
> -{
> - struct binder_task_work_cb *twcb = container_of(twork,
> - struct binder_task_work_cb, twork);
> -
> - fput(twcb->file);
> - kfree(twcb);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * binder_deferred_fd_close() - schedule a close for the given file-descriptor
> - * @fd: file-descriptor to close
> - *
> - * See comments in binder_do_fd_close(). This function is used to schedule
> - * a file-descriptor to be closed after returning from binder_ioctl().
> - */
> -static void binder_deferred_fd_close(int fd)
> -{
> - struct binder_task_work_cb *twcb;
> -
> - twcb = kzalloc(sizeof(*twcb), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!twcb)
> - return;
> - init_task_work(&twcb->twork, binder_do_fd_close);
> - twcb->file = file_close_fd(fd);
> - if (twcb->file) {
> - // pin it until binder_do_fd_close(); see comments there
> - get_file(twcb->file);
> - filp_close(twcb->file, current->files);
> - task_work_add(current, &twcb->twork, TWA_RESUME);
> - } else {
> - kfree(twcb);
> - }
> -}
> -
> static void binder_transaction_buffer_release(struct binder_proc *proc,
> struct binder_thread *thread,
> struct binder_buffer *buffer,
> @@ -2183,7 +2120,10 @@ static void binder_transaction_buffer_release(struct binder_proc *proc,
> offset, sizeof(fd));
> WARN_ON(err);
> if (!err) {
> - binder_deferred_fd_close(fd);
> + /*
> + * Intentionally ignore EBADF errors here.
> + */
> + close_fd_safe(fd, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> /*
> * Need to make sure the thread goes
> * back to userspace to complete the
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index 0a4f3bdb2dec..58e3825e846c 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> #include <linux/close_range.h>
> #include <linux/file_ref.h>
> +#include <linux/task_work.h>
> #include <net/sock.h>
> #include <linux/init_task.h>
>
> @@ -1525,3 +1526,47 @@ int iterate_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned n,
> return res;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iterate_fd);
> +
> +struct close_fd_safe_task_work {
> + struct callback_head twork;
> + struct file *file;
> +};
> +
> +static void close_fd_safe_callback(struct callback_head *twork)
> +{
> + struct close_fd_safe_task_work *twcb = container_of(twork,
> + struct close_fd_safe_task_work, twork);
> +
> + fput(twcb->file);
> + kfree(twcb);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * close_fd_safe - close the given fd
> + * @fd: file descriptor to close
> + * @flags: gfp flags for allocation of task work
> + *
> + * This closes an fd. Unlike close_fd(), this may be used even if the fd is
> + * currently held with fdget().
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 or an error code
> + */
> +int close_fd_safe(unsigned int fd, gfp_t flags)
> +{
> + struct close_fd_safe_task_work *twcb;
> +
> + twcb = kzalloc(sizeof(*twcb), flags);
> + if (!twcb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + init_task_work(&twcb->twork, close_fd_safe_callback);
> + twcb->file = file_close_fd(fd);
> + if (!twcb->file) {
> + kfree(twcb);
> + return -EBADF;
> + }
> +
> + get_file(twcb->file);
> + filp_close(twcb->file, current->files);
> + task_work_add(current, &twcb->twork, TWA_RESUME);
> + return 0;
> +}
Would need an EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(...) here right?
> diff --git a/include/linux/fdtable.h b/include/linux/fdtable.h
> index c45306a9f007..1c99a56c0cdf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fdtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fdtable.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ int iterate_fd(struct files_struct *, unsigned,
> const void *);
>
> extern int close_fd(unsigned int fd);
> +extern int close_fd_safe(unsigned int fd, gfp_t flags);
One nit, generally well in mm anyway we avoid the 'extern' and remove them as we
go. Not sure about vfs actually though?
> extern struct file *file_close_fd(unsigned int fd);
>
> extern struct kmem_cache *files_cachep;
I mean this is essentially taking what's in binder and making it a general
thing, so needs Christian's input on whether this is sensible I think :)
Cheers, Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists