[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260209153243.GBaYn-G02QE86Fje7g@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 16:32:43 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Carlos López <clopez@...e.de>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Babu Moger <bmoger@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: synthesize TSA CPUID bits via SCATTERED_F()
On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 07:06:36AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Maybe I could add a table showing how the XXX_F() macros map to various controls?
Perhaps start first, please, with explaining the difference between
SYNTHESIZED_F and SCATTERED_F and why you even need it?
I mean, KVM and guests only care whether X86_FEATURE flags are set or not, no?
Not how they get defined underneath...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists