[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <698b52ac.a70a0220.2c38d7.0076.GAE@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:45:48 -0800
From: syzbot ci <syzbot+ci0e6a00c2d76396f3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axelrasmussen@...gle.com, baohua@...nel.org,
bhe@...hat.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev,
chrisl@...nel.org, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, gourry@...rry.net,
hannes@...xchg.org, huang.ying.caritas@...il.com, hughd@...gle.com,
jannh@...gle.com, joshua.hahnjy@...il.com, kasong@...cent.com,
kernel-team@...a.com, len.brown@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
mhocko@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev, npache@...hat.com,
nphamcs@...il.com, osalvador@...e.de, pavel@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com,
pfalcato@...e.de, rafael@...nel.org, riel@...riel.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, ryan.roberts@....com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
shikemeng@...weicloud.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, weixugc@...gle.com,
yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev, yuanchu@...gle.com, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com
Cc: syzbot@...ts.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot ci] Re: Virtual Swap Space
syzbot ci has tested the following series
[v3] Virtual Swap Space
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260208215839.87595-1-nphamcs@gmail.com
* [PATCH v3 01/20] mm/swap: decouple swap cache from physical swap infrastructure
* [PATCH v3 02/20] swap: rearrange the swap header file
* [PATCH v3 03/20] mm: swap: add an abstract API for locking out swapoff
* [PATCH v3 04/20] zswap: add new helpers for zswap entry operations
* [PATCH v3 05/20] mm/swap: add a new function to check if a swap entry is in swap cached.
* [PATCH v3 06/20] mm: swap: add a separate type for physical swap slots
* [PATCH v3 07/20] mm: create scaffolds for the new virtual swap implementation
* [PATCH v3 08/20] zswap: prepare zswap for swap virtualization
* [PATCH v3 09/20] mm: swap: allocate a virtual swap slot for each swapped out page
* [PATCH v3 10/20] swap: move swap cache to virtual swap descriptor
* [PATCH v3 11/20] zswap: move zswap entry management to the virtual swap descriptor
* [PATCH v3 12/20] swap: implement the swap_cgroup API using virtual swap
* [PATCH v3 13/20] swap: manage swap entry lifecycle at the virtual swap layer
* [PATCH v3 14/20] mm: swap: decouple virtual swap slot from backing store
* [PATCH v3 15/20] zswap: do not start zswap shrinker if there is no physical swap slots
* [PATCH v3 16/20] swap: do not unnecesarily pin readahead swap entries
* [PATCH v3 17/20] swapfile: remove zeromap bitmap
* [PATCH v3 18/20] memcg: swap: only charge physical swap slots
* [PATCH v3 19/20] swap: simplify swapoff using virtual swap
* [PATCH v3 20/20] swapfile: replace the swap map with bitmaps
and found the following issue:
possible deadlock in vswap_iter
Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/b9defda6-daec-4c41-bbf9-7d3b7fabd7cb
***
possible deadlock in vswap_iter
tree: bpf
URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git
base: 05f7e89ab9731565d8a62e3b5d1ec206485eeb0b
arch: amd64
compiler: Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/f444cfbe-4ce0-4917-94aa-3a8bd96ee376/config
C repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/7b8c50b1-47d6-42e0-bcfc-814e7b3bb596/c_repro
syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/7b8c50b1-47d6-42e0-bcfc-814e7b3bb596/syz_repro
loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 764
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor625/5806 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88811884c018 (&cluster->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88811884c018 (&cluster->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vswap_iter+0xfa/0x1b0 mm/vswap.c:274
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88811884c018 (&cluster->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline]
ffff88811884c018 (&cluster->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: swap_cache_lock_irq+0xe2/0x190 mm/vswap.c:1586
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&cluster->lock);
lock(&cluster->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by syz-executor625/5806:
#0: ffff888174bc2800 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: mmap_read_lock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:391 [inline]
#0: ffff888174bc2800 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: madvise_lock+0x152/0x2e0 mm/madvise.c:1789
#1: ffff88811884c018 (&cluster->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline]
#1: ffff88811884c018 (&cluster->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: swap_cache_lock_irq+0xe2/0x190 mm/vswap.c:1586
#2: ffffffff8e55a360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e55a360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:867 [inline]
#2: ffffffff8e55a360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: vswap_cgroup_record+0x40/0x290 mm/vswap.c:1925
stack backtrace:
***
If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
Tested-by: syzbot@...kaller.appspotmail.com
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists