[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYr-gyQN_AaIJkSH@macos>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:45:20 +0100
From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
Cc: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] rust: xarray: add debug format for `StoreError`
On 2026-02-09 15:38, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> Add a `Debug` implementation for `StoreError<T>` to enable better error
> reporting and debugging. The implementation only displays the `error`
> field and omits the `value` field, as `T` may not implement `Debug`.
>
> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
> Acked-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
> ---
> rust/kernel/xarray.rs | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/xarray.rs b/rust/kernel/xarray.rs
> index 88625c9abf4ef..d9762c6bef19c 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/xarray.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/xarray.rs
> @@ -193,6 +193,14 @@ pub struct StoreError<T> {
> pub value: T,
> }
>
> +impl<T> core::fmt::Debug for StoreError<T> {
> + fn fmt(&self, f: &mut core::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> core::fmt::Result {
> + f.debug_struct("StoreError")
> + .field("error", &self.error)
> + .finish()
> + }
> +}
> +
Is there any best practice for when to include use core::fmt::*, so you can
avoid being verbose here?
I see other cases like this, but I couldn't find anything in the code
guidelines.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists