lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <82aeb78bbfb80cb6861b85e4db9d398f6c8e331b.1770760558.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:18:54 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
	"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@...look.com>,
	Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>,
	Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@...il.com>,
	Vern Hao <vernhao@...cent.com>,
	Vern Hao <haoxing990@...il.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>,
	Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@...el.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@...il.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
	Adam Li <adamli@...amperecomputing.com>,
	Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@...edance.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
	Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>,
	Gavin Guo <gavinguo@...lia.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
	Libo Chen <libchen@...estorage.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 14/21] sched/cache: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach

During the final step of load balancing, can_migrate_task() now
considers a task's LLC preference before moving it out of its
preferred LLC.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Co-developed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
---

Notes:
    v2->v3:
    Use the similar mechanism as NUMA balancing, which skips over
    the tasks that would degrade locality in can_migrate_task();
    and only if nr_balanced_failed is high enough do we ignore that.
    (Peter Zijlstra)
    
    Let migrate_degrade_locality() take precedence over
    migrate_degrades_llc(), which aims to migrate towards the preferred
    NUMA node. (Peter Zijlstra)

 kernel/sched/fair.c  | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 kernel/sched/sched.h | 13 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 03959a701514..d1145997b88d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9973,8 +9973,8 @@ static enum llc_mig can_migrate_llc(int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
  * Check if task p can migrate from source LLC to
  * destination LLC in terms of cache aware load balance.
  */
-static __maybe_unused enum llc_mig can_migrate_llc_task(int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
-							struct task_struct *p)
+static enum llc_mig can_migrate_llc_task(int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
+					 struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 	bool to_pref;
@@ -10041,6 +10041,47 @@ alb_break_llc(struct lb_env *env)
 
 	return false;
 }
+
+/*
+ * Check if migrating task p from env->src_cpu to
+ * env->dst_cpu breaks LLC localiy.
+ */
+static bool migrate_degrades_llc(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
+{
+	if (!sched_cache_enabled())
+		return false;
+
+	if (task_has_sched_core(p))
+		return false;
+	/*
+	 * Skip over tasks that would degrade LLC locality;
+	 * only when nr_balanced_failed is sufficiently high do we
+	 * ignore this constraint.
+	 *
+	 * Threshold of cache_nice_tries is set to 1 higher
+	 * than nr_balance_failed to avoid excessive task
+	 * migration at the same time. Refer to comments around
+	 * llc_balance().
+	 */
+	if (env->sd->nr_balance_failed >= env->sd->cache_nice_tries + 1)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * We know the env->src_cpu has some tasks prefer to
+	 * run on env->dst_cpu, skip the tasks do not prefer
+	 * env->dst_cpu, and find the one that prefers.
+	 */
+	if (env->migration_type == migrate_llc_task &&
+	    task_llc(p) != llc_id(env->dst_cpu))
+		return true;
+
+	if (can_migrate_llc_task(env->src_cpu,
+				 env->dst_cpu, p) != mig_forbid)
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 #else
 static inline bool get_llc_stats(int cpu, unsigned long *util,
 				 unsigned long *cap)
@@ -10053,6 +10094,12 @@ alb_break_llc(struct lb_env *env)
 {
 	return false;
 }
+
+static inline bool
+migrate_degrades_llc(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
+{
+	return false;
+}
 #endif
 /*
  * can_migrate_task - may task p from runqueue rq be migrated to this_cpu?
@@ -10150,10 +10197,19 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
 		return 1;
 
 	degrades = migrate_degrades_locality(p, env);
-	if (!degrades)
+	if (!degrades) {
+		/*
+		 * If the NUMA locality is not broken,
+		 * further check if migration would hurt
+		 * LLC locality.
+		 */
+		if (migrate_degrades_llc(p, env))
+			return 0;
+
 		hot = task_hot(p, env);
-	else
+	} else {
 		hot = degrades > 0;
+	}
 
 	if (!hot || env->sd->nr_balance_failed > env->sd->cache_nice_tries) {
 		if (hot)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index ac8c7ac1ac0d..c18e59f320a6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1495,6 +1495,14 @@ extern void sched_core_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
 extern void sched_core_get(void);
 extern void sched_core_put(void);
 
+static inline bool task_has_sched_core(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	if (sched_core_disabled())
+		return false;
+
+	return !!p->core_cookie;
+}
+
 #else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CORE: */
 
 static inline bool sched_core_enabled(struct rq *rq)
@@ -1534,6 +1542,11 @@ static inline bool sched_group_cookie_match(struct rq *rq,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static inline bool task_has_sched_core(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #endif /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
-- 
2.32.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ