linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] drm/ci: uprev IGT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ed6508c-78ab-4606-b503-9bc54f5cdea9@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:49:46 +0530
From: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, daniels@...labora.com,
 helen.fornazier@...il.com, airlied@...il.com, simona.vetter@...ll.ch,
 lumag@...nel.org, robdclark@...il.com, robin.clark@....qualcomm.com,
 guilherme.gallo@...labora.com, sergi.blanch.torne@...labora.com,
 valentine.burley@...labora.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] drm/ci: uprev IGT

Hi Dmitry,

On 27/01/26 19:55, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 06:26:11PM +0530, Vignesh Raman wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> On 27/01/26 18:01, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 04:14:01PM +0530, Vignesh Raman wrote:
>>>> Recent IGT [1] seems to be broken on MSM hardware, with many tests
>>>> failing due to the old_primary->index != 0 assertion. Uprev IGT to
>>>> the last known good revision where the tests pass, and update the
>>>> expectation files accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/-/commit/a909ab05
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
>>>
>>> It is not clear, which parts here are due to Mesa uprev (yes, there are
>>> some of those) and which are due to the IGT uprev. Please split into two
>>> commits and make sure that Mesa-uprev passes more or less clearly.
>>
>> The mesa uprev and the IGT uprev are already split into two separate
>> commits. The IGT uprev only updates the IGT version in gitlab-ci.yml and
>> xfails.
> 
> I think I was not clear enough: Mesa uprev also causes some of the
> xfails. Those needs to be a part of the Mesa uprev commit.

I have created v2 where the mesa uprev commit also includes the updated 
xfails. I will send IGT uprev as a separate commit/series.

https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260210071138.2256773-1-vignesh.raman@collabora.com/T/#t

Regards,
Vignesh

> 
>