[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5dc113c1-c9c4-4420-832d-65681414cee2@cock.li>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:17:02 +0530
From: Shivam Kalra <shivamklr@...k.li>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, "Liam R. Howlett"
<Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] rust: binder: shrink all_procs when deregistering
processes
On 09/02/26 19:24, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>
> Hmm. This way we need to reallocate immediately if one more process is
> added. How about:
>
> if len < cap / 4 {
> shrink_to(cap / 2);
> }
>
> Alice
Good point, that avoids the shrink-then-immediately-regrow pattern.
Will adopt this for v4.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists