linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] soc: qcom: ice: Remove platform_driver support and expose as a pure library

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFocm3yRTG0TJJRxfDvJMjvvvri5fzi_HoNY4YSd-41oKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:43:53 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, 
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, 
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@....qualcomm.com>, 
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] soc: qcom: ice: Remove platform_driver support and
 expose as a pure library

On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 at 07:56, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
<devnull+manivannan.sadhasivam.oss.qualcomm.com@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This series removes the platform_driver support from Qcom ICE driver and
> exposes it as a pure library to the clients to avoid race conditions with ICE
> SCM call availability.
>
> Merge Strategy
> ==============
>
> ICE patches (1,2) through Qcom tree and MMC/UFS patches (3,4) through respective
> subsystem trees as there is no dependency.

Just wanted to double check that this is really correct....

The propagated error codes (or NULL) are changed in patch1/patch2, so
is it really okay to pick the mmc/ufs patches (patch3 and patch4)
independently?

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>
> * Added MODULE_* macros back
> * Removed spurious platform_device_put()
> * Added patches to remove NULL return
>
> ---
> Manivannan Sadhasivam (4):
>       soc: qcom: ice: Remove platform_driver support and expose as a pure library
>       soc: qcom: ice: Return proper error codes from devm_of_qcom_ice_get() instead of NULL
>       mmc: sdhci-msm: Remove NULL check from devm_of_qcom_ice_get()
>       scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Remove NULL check from devm_of_qcom_ice_get()
>
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c |  10 ++--
>  drivers/soc/qcom/ice.c       | 127 ++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c  |  10 ++--
>  3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 8f0b4cce4481fb22653697cced8d0d04027cb1e8
> change-id: 20260210-qcom-ice-fix-d2a3a045b32d
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
>
>