[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgnRQiKqWVrO_uF1btYM2K8r8xL95RGdKU3QLe8B58nrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 10:32:12 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates for v7.0
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 at 05:34, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Note that, this time I have picked up some changes to improve the mux subsystem
> and those are part of this pull-request, as these changes are required for mmc.
No.
Those changes are complete garbage and don't even compile. It has
apparently never been in linux-next or been build-tested in any way.
When CONFIG_MULTIPLEXER=m, we build that core.o file
obj-$(CONFIG_MULTIPLEXER) += mux-core.o
but in include/linux/mux/consumer.h you have
#ifdef CONFIG_MULTIPLEXER
which won't be true (because what will be defined is
CONFIG_MULTIPLEXER_MODULE), so then you get a long stream of things
like
drivers/mux/core.c:312:14: error: redefinition of ‘mux_control_states’
because the mux/consumer.h header will have defined the dummy wrapper function.
In other words, that commit ad314348ceb4 ("mux: Add helper functions
for getting optional and selected mux-state") is pure unadulterated
untested garbage.
I do not want to see a "fixed" pull request from you. This was
entirely unacceptable, and I will not be pulling anything more from
you this merge window.
Stop sending me untested crap that hasn't been in linux-next and
doesn't even pass the most cursory smell test.
You can try again for 7.1, but only if it has been actually in
linux-next and properly tested.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists