linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86/entry for 7.0-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiKry6C8QP1Rp8WDH1OU+4+uvSJ3K9Px4bYrNE16OC0MA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 10:35:19 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/entry for 7.0-rc1

On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 at 10:16, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> wrote:
>
> There may be actual benefits of having source and output not to be mixed.

I'm perfectly happy for you to do that, and I agree that it has advantages.

But I'm *not* willing to have your say that everybody else has to do
that, and you forcing me to work in those ways.

So the "mixed source and build tree" had better work and not cause problems.

                Linus