[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYz7t7vG2W8ieEgx@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 21:59:19 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] x86/mm/pat: Convert split_large_page() to use
ptdescs
On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 11:52:33AM -0800, Vishal Moola (Oracle) wrote:
> static int
> __split_large_page(struct cpa_data *cpa, pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address,
> - struct page *base)
> + struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
> {
> unsigned long lpaddr, lpinc, ref_pfn, pfn, pfninc = 1;
> + struct page *base = ptdesc_page(ptdesc);
> pte_t *pbase = (pte_t *)page_address(base);
We have ptdesc_address() already. Can we avoid the other uses of
'base' in this function?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists