[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260210201101.5df36a41@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 20:11:01 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean
<vladimir.oltean@....com>, Köry Maincent
<kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Nicolò Veronese
<nicveronese@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
mwojtas@...omium.org, Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>, Daniel
Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/13] net: phy_port: SFP modules
representation and phy_port listing
On Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:23:03 +0100 Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Here's V5 of the second phy_port series, this time bringing support for
> more phy_port use especially for SFP, as well as the begining of a
> ethnl uAPI.
>
> V5 doesn't contain a lot of changes, only a doc formatting fix as well
> as a fix for a potentially un-initialized pointer.
Any idea why this is set to Changes Requested in PW? :S
The 3rd patch carries a Fixes tag, makes me want to apply the first
3 changes for 7.0..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists