[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYvO2IaYnyWYDHTX@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 16:38:06 -0800
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, hughd@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, muchun.song@...ux.dev, david@...nel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, ziy@...dia.com, harry.yoo@...cle.com, yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev,
imran.f.khan@...cle.com, kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com,
yuanchu@...gle.com, weixugc@...gle.com, chenridong@...weicloud.com, mkoutny@...e.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com, apais@...ux.microsoft.com,
lance.yang@...ux.dev, bhe@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 29/31] mm: memcontrol: prepare for reparenting
non-hierarchical stats
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 02:47:51PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Add the usage of these start and end functions in mod_memcg_state() and
> > mod_memcg_lruvec_state() in this patch.
>
> Using these two function will change the behavior of mod_memcg_state()
> and mod_memcg_lruvec_state(), but LRU folios has not yet been
> reparented.
>
> To ensure the patch itself is error-free, I chose to place the usage of
> these two function in patch #30.
Makes sense.
I think we are good with respect to this patch series (next version), it
will miss 7.0 but I think that is fine, 7.1 is not too far.
Thanks for pushing this through.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists