[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYxieS3Pycm5UthH@e134344.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 11:05:29 +0000
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: amitsinght@...vell.com, baisheng.gao@...soc.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, carl@...amperecomputing.com,
dave.martin@....com, david@...nel.org, dfustini@...libre.com,
fenghuay@...dia.com, gshan@...hat.com, james.morse@....com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, kobak@...dia.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peternewman@...gle.com, punit.agrawal@....qualcomm.com,
quic_jiles@...cinc.com, rohit.mathew@....com,
scott@...amperecomputing.com, sdonthineni@...dia.com,
tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com, xhao@...ux.alibaba.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
maz@...nel.org, oupton@...nel.org, joey.gouly@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
zengheng4@...wei.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/41] arm_mpam: resctrl: Pick the caches we will use
as resctrl resources
Hi Reinette,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 03:39:51PM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 2/3/26 1:43 PM, Ben Horgan wrote:
> ...
> > +
> > static int mpam_resctrl_control_init(struct mpam_resctrl_res *res)
> > {
> > - /* TODO: initialise the resctrl resources */
> > + struct mpam_class *class = res->class;
> > + struct rdt_resource *r = &res->resctrl_res;
> > +
> > + switch (r->rid) {
> > + case RDT_RESOURCE_L2:
> > + case RDT_RESOURCE_L3:
> > + r->alloc_capable = true;
> > + r->schema_fmt = RESCTRL_SCHEMA_BITMAP;
> > + r->cache.arch_has_sparse_bitmasks = true;
> > +
> > + r->cache.cbm_len = class->props.cpbm_wd;
> > + /* mpam_devices will reject empty bitmaps */
> > + r->cache.min_cbm_bits = 1;
> > +
> > + if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_L2) {
> > + r->name = "L2";
>
> This code is fine but highlights that resctrl fs should not let the
> arch need to do this since this name is used as part of user interface.
Yes, not ideal but I don't think it's urgent to tidy this up.
>
> > + r->ctrl_scope = RESCTRL_L2_CACHE;
> > + } else {
> > + r->name = "L3";
> > + r->ctrl_scope = RESCTRL_L3_CACHE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Which bits are shared with other ...things...
> > + * Unknown devices use partid-0 which uses all the bitmap
> > + * fields. Until we configured the SMMU and GIC not to do this
> > + * 'all the bits' is the correct answer here.
> > + */
> > + r->cache.shareable_bits = resctrl_get_default_ctrl(r);
>
> I would like to recommend one style change to set r->alloc_capable as the final
> setting. This is the setting that informs resctrl fs that this resource needs
> attention. The reason I recommend this to be done last is if/when a future
> change adds some configuration here that may fail then it should not fail with
> r->alloc_capable as true while partially initialized.
Makes sense. This will make the code more robust.
>
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -324,7 +409,8 @@ int mpam_resctrl_setup(void)
> > res->resctrl_res.rid = rid;
> > }
> >
> > - /* TODO: pick MPAM classes to map to resctrl resources */
> > + /* Find some classes to use for controls */
> > + mpam_resctrl_pick_caches();
> >
> > /* Initialise the resctrl structures from the classes */
> > for_each_mpam_resctrl_control(res, rid) {
>
> Reinette
Thanks,
Ben
Powered by blists - more mailing lists