[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2cba5b0-9f87-4787-b2fb-6a4756abad99@zohomail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 19:49:35 +0800
From: Li Ming <ming.li@...omail.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
Cc: dave@...olabs.net, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix port enumeration failure
在 2026/2/10 23:00, Dave Jiang 写道:
>
> On 2/10/26 4:56 AM, Li Ming wrote:
>> 在 2026/2/10 11:04, Alison Schofield 写道:
>>> On Sat, Feb 07, 2026 at 09:35:10PM +0800, Li Ming wrote:
>>>> I ran CXL mock testing with next branch, I usually hit the following
>>>> call trace.
>>> Hi Ming,
>>> I started hitting this after you first posted, however it takes me a
>>> long time to hit it. Do you have a method to reproduce that is better
>>> than running on repeat as I do? Thanks!
>>> -- Alison
>>>
>>> snip
>> Hi Alison,
>>
>> My environment is a VM with 2 CPUs, maybe you can try it.
>>
>> I use a script to run "meson test --suite=cxl" again and again in the VM.
> The other day Alison showed me the --repeat=N parameter for meson test. You can use that instead of script unless it does something special.
>
Good to know that, thanks. I tried it and it can also hit the issue.
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists