lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYyGIPNeHWpluaoF@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 15:37:36 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Erikas Bitovtas <xerikasxx@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: light: vcnl4000: add Capella
 CM36686 and CM36672P

On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 03:32:41PM +0200, Erikas Bitovtas wrote:

> >>> Please implement previous feedback.
> >>
> >> Since I am making changes to the existing driver instead of creating a new one,
> >> I introduced a new patch series. As I mentioned in the cover letter, cm36686 is
> >> fully compatible with vcnl4040, so instead of creating a new binding, I create a
> >> fallback compatible for the device. I probably should have named this patch
> >> series something else.
> > 
> > That's fine, but that's v3 of previous patches. Your work was to add
> > CM36686 support. How you do it, evolves, but patchset/work is one
> > continuous work. When you rework approach next time, you also start from
> > v1? And then you go back to previous solution of new driver it will jump
> > from v1 to v3?
> > 
> 
> There has been a misunderstanding. I assumed that since I will no longer
> be developing that driver, this warrants a new patch series. I apologize
> for this.
> Here is the changelog since v2:
> - Remove the previous unnecessary proposed driver and bindings.
> - Add a fallback compatible for cm36686 of vcnl4040.
> - Add a new compatible for cm36672p.
> - Add channel info for cm36672p.
> - Remove redundant information in the dt-bindings commit message.
> Here is the link to v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20260209182432.00006c3c@huawei.com/
> 
> I have received some feedback regarding the changes I made to the
> existing vcnl4000 driver. Shall I submit the implementation of it as a
> v3 to that series of patches?

I guess v4 would be better as this is assumed misversioned v3, if I got
the situation correctly.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ