netdev - Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061128.210416.59658806.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:04:16 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	kaber@...sh.net, khc@...waw.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...ts.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely
 duplicate route_reverse function

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:56:57 +1100

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > 
> > Longer term this is really messy, we should handle this some
> > other way.
> 
> Definitely.  I'm not sure whether 48 is enough even for recursive
> tunnels.  This should really just be a hint.  It's OK to spend a
> bit of time reallocating skb's if it's too small, but it's not OK
> to die.

The recursive tunnel case is handled by the PMTU reductions
in the route, isn't it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html