[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <456DA6BB.6080800@linux-vs.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:26:51 +0800
From: Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>
To: Horms <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@...d.net>,
Jinhua Luo <home_king@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [IPVS] transparent proxying
Hi Horms,
I see that this patch probably makes IPVS code a bit complicated and
packet traversing less efficiently.
If I remember correctly, policy-based routing can work with IPVS in
kernel 2.2 and 2.4 for transparent cache cluster for a long time. It
should work in kernel 2.6 too.
For example, we can use iptables/ipchains to mark all web traffic with
fwmark 1, then use policy-based routing to route all web traffic through
NF_IP_LOCAL_IN, so that ip_vs_in can capture the packets and load
balance packets to cache servers.
ip rule add prio 100 fwmark 1 table 100
ip route add local 0/0 dev lo table 100
ipvsadm -A -f 1 -s wlc
ipvsadm -a -f 1 -w 100 -r cache1
ipvsadm -a -f 1 -w 100 -r cache2
ipvsadm -a -f 1 -w 100 -r cache2
...
Cheers,
Wensong
Horms wrote:
> This seems to be a pretty clean solution to a real problem.
>
> Ultimately I would like to see IPVS move into the forward chain.
> This seems to be a nice way to explore that, without breaking
> any existing setups.
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists