[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061129224400.GC18057@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:44:00 +0100
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
Cc: "Basheer, Mansoor Ahamed" <mansoor.ahamed@...com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Realtek 8139 driver (8139too.c) TX Timeout doesn't allow interrupt handler to disable receive interrupts at high bi-directional traffic
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org> :
[...]
> @@ -1682,12 +1685,11 @@ static void rtl8139_tx_timeout_task (voi
> rtl8139_tx_clear (tp);
> spin_unlock_irq(&tp->lock);
>
> + netif_poll_enable();
^ -> dev
> +
> /* ...and finally, reset everything */
> - if (netif_running(dev)) {
> - rtl8139_hw_start (dev);
> - netif_wake_queue (dev);
> - }
> - spin_unlock_bh(&tp->rx_lock);
> + rtl8139_hw_start (dev);
> + netif_wake_queue (dev);
> }
rtl8139_hw_start() may mess with cur_rx, whence a race with rtl8139_rx()
if an in-flight interruption enables it a bit too fast. I'd rather go
with:
[...]
rtl8139_tx_clear (tp);
rtl8139_hw_start (dev);
netif_wake_queue (dev);
netif_poll_enable(dev);
spin_unlock_irq(&tp->lock);
}
Otherwise the patch is cool.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists